Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05415
Original file (BC 2012 05415.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC


Office of the Assistant Secretary


AFBCMR BC-2012-05415



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

	Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that:

	The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 April 2012, he was furnished an entry-level separation with a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “KFF” and a narrative reason for separation of “Secretarial Authority.”




                                                                           
                                                                           Director
                                                                           Air Force Review Boards Agency





























Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02787

    Original file (BC 2013 02787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2013-02787 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02900

    Original file (BC 2013 02900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2013-02900 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02898

    Original file (BC-2012-02898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She transferred to the Air Force Reserve effective 29 May 2012; the date her appointment was approved by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). The General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the SecDef approved the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04865

    Original file (BC 2013 04865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval to reflect no break in service. Due to a delay in processing of the 20 August 2012 scroll at the SECDEF level, the applicant incurred a break in service between her date of separation (DOS) and appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. OSD General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the Secretary of Defense approves the appointment or the date the oath...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03084

    Original file (BC 2012 03084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His narrative reason for separation was “Homosexual – Acts.” In a letter to the applicant dated 24 Aug 2012, addressing correction of his DD Form 214, AFPC/DPSOR advised the applicant that due to regulations, they cannot amend the DD Form 214 to add the John L. Levitow Honor Graduate award. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C,D, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03017

    Original file (BC 2012 03017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her narrative reason for separation does not have an effect on her RE code, as her RE code is driven by her involuntary discharge and honorable character of service. However, by a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of a change to the reentry code. AFPC/DPSOR has admitted that her discharge reason for separation and the corresponding separation code should be corrected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00555

    Original file (BC-2012-00555.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When the discharge authority approved the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable character of service, her RE Code should have been changed to “2C” Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge or Entry Level Separation Without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05513

    Original file (BC 2012 05513.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed so that he can be eligible for enlistment into the coast guard reserve. On 2 February 1999, the applicant was furnished an Entry-Level Separation with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05022

    Original file (BC-2011-05022.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. Although the applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to general, based on the repeal of DADT, the Department of Defense issued policy guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02068

    Original file (BC-2012-02068.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His narrative reason for separation, “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service,” be changed. DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 2 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 Aug 2012, copies of...